Bill Summary
![]() | S722: A bill to direct the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to jointly conduct a study of certain land adjacent to the Walnut Canyon National Monument in the State of Arizona [0 comments] |
- Directs the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Agriculture to conduct a study of specified federal land in Coconino National Forest, state and private lands, and Walnut Canyon National Monument in Arizona (the study area) to evaluate: (1) the significance of the resources and public values of the study area as the resources and public values pertain to the management objectives of the Forest Service and the National Park Service (NPS); (2) the opportunities for maintaining existing public uses; and (3) a range of options for managing and conserving resources by the NPS or the Forest Service, or by both agencies, including the feasibility of a boundary adjustment to the Monument, designation of the study area as a National Recreation Area, maintaining the study area as managed by the Forest Service, and any other designation or management option that will accomplish the protection of resources and the maintenance of public use and access for such area.
- Requires the Secretaries to: (1) designate a lead agency; (2) consult with appropriate federal, state, county, and local government entities; (3) contract with a third-party consultant with experience in park and land use planning to prepare a draft study; and (4) collaborate with the Forest Supervisor of the Coconino National Forest, the Superintendent of the Flagstaff Area National Monuments, the Flagstaff City Council, and Coconino County Board of Supervisors in developing a scope of work for the draft study under the guidance of the third-party consultant.
|
|
View full text
|
View bill history |
Additional Information
S722 at GovTrack
|
S722 at the Library of Congress
|
Sponsor
|
Republican
Arizona http://mccain.senate.gov/ |
Co-Sponsors
|
Sen. Jon Kyl [R, AZ] |
Arguments
Add argument
|
For
No arguments for this bill have been posted yet. Be the first one! |
Against
No arguments against this bill have been posted yet. Be the first one! |
Comments
No comments have been posted yet. Be the first one!



View full text
View bill history
S722 at GovTrack
S722 at the Library of Congress
Add comment